← All models
Compare

Claude Fable 5 vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro

Claude Fable 5 (Anthropic) and MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Xiaomi Corp) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeClaude Fable 5Anthropic · 40 in the newsMiMo-V2.5-ProXiaomi Corp
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)161
Coding9973
Math95
Reasoning & Knowledge9666
Agentic & Tools9877
Specifications
DeveloperAnthropicXiaomi Corp
FamilyClaude
ReleasedJun 9, 2026Apr 23, 2026
Parameters1T
AvailabilityAPI accessOpen weights (unrestricted)
Context window1M1.1M
Price — $/M input$10.00$0.43
Price — $/M output$50.00$0.87
Inputstext, image, filetext
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/2025100%
APEX45%
GPQA Diamond93%87%
Humanity's Last Exam53%34%
SciCode60%50%
SimpleBench82%
SimpleQA Verified68%
WebDev Arena16541471
WeirdML92%
τ²-bench99%94%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5 or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is cheaper on input tokens at $0.43 per million, versus $10.00 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, Claude Fable 5 or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro supports up to 1.1M tokens, compared with 1M for the other.

Which is better for coding, Claude Fable 5 or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Claude Fable 5 ranks higher — 99th vs 73th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.