← All models
Compare

Claude Fable 5 vs LongCat-2.0

Claude Fable 5 (Anthropic) and LongCat-2.0 (Meituan Inc) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeClaude Fable 5Anthropic · 51 in the newsLongCat-2.0Meituan Inc · 2 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)163
Coding9614
Math96
Reasoning & Knowledge8940
Agentic & Tools96
Specifications
DeveloperAnthropicMeituan Inc
FamilyClaude
ReleasedJun 9, 2026Jun 29, 2026
Parameters1.6T
AvailabilityAPI accessOpen weights (unrestricted)
Context window1M1M
Price — $/M input$10.00$0.30
Price — $/M output$50.00$1.20
Inputstext, image, filetext
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/2025100%
APEX45%
ARC-AGI99%
ARC-AGI-289%
GPQA Diamond86%78%
Humanity's Last Exam56%34%
SciCode61%36%
SimpleBench82%
SimpleQA Verified71%
WebDev Arena1626
WeirdML92%
τ²-bench99%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5 or LongCat-2.0?

LongCat-2.0 is cheaper on input tokens at $0.30 per million, versus $10.00 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, Claude Fable 5 or LongCat-2.0?

LongCat-2.0 supports up to 1M tokens, compared with 1M for the other.

Which is better for coding, Claude Fable 5 or LongCat-2.0?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Claude Fable 5 ranks higher — 96th vs 14th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.