Compare
Claude Fable 5 vs Ling-3.0-flash
Claude Fable 5 (Anthropic) and Ling-3.0-flash (—) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.
- Claude Fable 5 has a larger context window (1M vs 262K tokens).
| Attribute | Claude Fable 5 | Ling-3.0-flash |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Intelligence (ECI) | 161 | — |
| Coding | 99 | — |
| Math | 95 | — |
| Reasoning & Knowledge | 96 | — |
| Agentic & Tools | 98 | — |
| Specifications | ||
| Developer | Anthropic | — |
| Family | Claude | — |
| Released | Jun 9, 2026 | Jul 23, 2026 |
| Parameters | — | — |
| Availability | API access | — |
| Context window | 1M | 262K |
| Price — $/M input | $10.00 | — |
| Price — $/M output | $50.00 | — |
| Inputs | text, image, file | text |
| Outputs | text | text |
| Benchmarks | ||
| AIME 2024/2025 | 100% | — |
| APEX | 45% | — |
| GPQA Diamond | 93% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 53% | — |
| SciCode | 60% | — |
| SimpleBench | 82% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 68% | — |
| WebDev Arena | 1654 | — |
| WeirdML | 92% | — |
| τ²-bench | 99% | — |
Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.
Frequently asked questions
Which has a larger context window, Claude Fable 5 or Ling-3.0-flash?
Claude Fable 5 supports up to 1M tokens, compared with 262K for the other.
Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.
More comparisons
Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.