← All models
Compare

Claude Fable 5 vs Kimi K2.7 Code

Claude Fable 5 (Anthropic) and Kimi K2.7 Code (Moonshot) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeClaude Fable 5Anthropic · 40 in the newsKimi K2.7 CodeMoonshot
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)161150
Coding9970
Math9581
Reasoning & Knowledge9659
Agentic & Tools9859
Specifications
DeveloperAnthropicMoonshot
FamilyClaudeKimi
ReleasedJun 9, 2026Jun 12, 2026
Parameters
AvailabilityAPI accessOpen weights (unrestricted)
Context window1M262K
Price — $/M input$10.00$0.86
Price — $/M output$50.00$3.80
Inputstext, image, filetext, image
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/2025100%96%
APEX45%28%
GPQA Diamond93%90%
Humanity's Last Exam53%33%
SciCode60%48%
SimpleBench82%58%
SimpleQA Verified68%39%
WebDev Arena16541479
WeirdML92%54%
τ²-bench99%90%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Fable 5 better than Kimi K2.7 Code?

On Epoch AI's Capabilities Index, Claude Fable 5 scores higher (161) than Kimi K2.7 Code (150). The right pick depends on your task — compare their coding, math, and reasoning scores in the table above.

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5 or Kimi K2.7 Code?

Kimi K2.7 Code is cheaper on input tokens at $0.86 per million, versus $10.00 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, Claude Fable 5 or Kimi K2.7 Code?

Claude Fable 5 supports up to 1M tokens, compared with 262K for the other.

Which is better for coding, Claude Fable 5 or Kimi K2.7 Code?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Claude Fable 5 ranks higher — 99th vs 70th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.