← All models
Compare

Claude Fable 5 vs Kimi K2

Claude Fable 5 (Anthropic) and Kimi K2 (Moonshot) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeClaude Fable 5Anthropic · 40 in the newsKimi K2Moonshot · 17 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)161140
Coding999
Math955
Reasoning & Knowledge9615
Agentic & Tools9820
Specifications
DeveloperAnthropicMoonshot
FamilyClaudeKimi
ReleasedJun 9, 2026Sep 5, 2025
Parameters1T
AvailabilityAPI accessOpen weights (restricted use)
Context window1M131K
Price — $/M input$10.00$0.57
Price — $/M output$50.00$2.30
Inputstext, image, filetext
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/2025100%57%
APEX45%
GPQA Diamond93%77%
Humanity's Last Exam53%7%
SciCode60%35%
SimpleBench82%26%
SimpleQA Verified68%
WebDev Arena1654
WeirdML92%39%
τ²-bench99%61%
GSO (code optimization)5%
LiveCodeBench56%
MMLU-Pro82%
Terminal-Bench28%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Fable 5 better than Kimi K2?

On Epoch AI's Capabilities Index, Claude Fable 5 scores higher (161) than Kimi K2 (140). The right pick depends on your task — compare their coding, math, and reasoning scores in the table above.

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5 or Kimi K2?

Kimi K2 is cheaper on input tokens at $0.57 per million, versus $10.00 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, Claude Fable 5 or Kimi K2?

Claude Fable 5 supports up to 1M tokens, compared with 131K for the other.

Which is better for coding, Claude Fable 5 or Kimi K2?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Claude Fable 5 ranks higher — 99th vs 9th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.