← All models
Compare

Claude Fable 5 vs Inkling

Claude Fable 5 (Anthropic) and Inkling (Thinking Machines) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeClaude Fable 5Anthropic · 34 in the newsInklingThinking Machines · 2 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)161
Coding10060
Math94
Reasoning & Knowledge9560
Agentic & Tools97
Specifications
DeveloperAnthropicThinking Machines
FamilyClaude
ReleasedJun 9, 2026Jul 15, 2026
Parameters975B
AvailabilityAPI accessOpen weights (unrestricted)
Context window1M524K
Price — $/M input$10.00$1.00
Price — $/M output$50.00$4.05
Inputstext, image, filetext, image, audio
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/2025100%
APEX45%
GPQA Diamond93%87%
Humanity's Last Exam53%30%
SciCode60%46%
SimpleBench82%
SimpleQA Verified68%
WebDev Arena1654
WeirdML88%
τ²-bench99%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5 or Inkling?

Inkling is cheaper on input tokens at $1.00 per million, versus $10.00 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, Claude Fable 5 or Inkling?

Claude Fable 5 supports up to 1M tokens, compared with 524K for the other.

Which is better for coding, Claude Fable 5 or Inkling?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Claude Fable 5 ranks higher — 100th vs 60th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.