← All models
Compare

Claude Fable 5 vs Grok 4.3 Beta

Claude Fable 5 (Anthropic) and Grok 4.3 Beta (xAI) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeClaude Fable 5Anthropic · 52 in the newsGrok 4.3 BetaxAI
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)163149
Coding9622
Math9660
Reasoning & Knowledge8941
Agentic & Tools96
Specifications
DeveloperAnthropicxAI
FamilyClaudeGrok
ReleasedJun 9, 2026Apr 17, 2026
Parameters
AvailabilityAPI accessHosted access (no API)
Context window1M
Price — $/M input$10.00
Price — $/M output$50.00
Inputstext, image, file
Outputstext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/2025100%93%
APEX45%
ARC-AGI99%
ARC-AGI-289%
GPQA Diamond86%89%
Humanity's Last Exam56%
SciCode61%
SimpleBench82%
SimpleQA Verified71%33%
WebDev Arena16261357
WeirdML92%50%
τ²-bench99%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Fable 5 better than Grok 4.3 Beta?

On Epoch AI's Capabilities Index, Claude Fable 5 scores higher (163) than Grok 4.3 Beta (149). The right pick depends on your task — compare their coding, math, and reasoning scores in the table above.

Which is better for coding, Claude Fable 5 or Grok 4.3 Beta?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Claude Fable 5 ranks higher — 96th vs 22th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.