← All models
Compare

Claude Fable 5 vs Grok 4.20

Claude Fable 5 (Anthropic) and Grok 4.20 (xAI) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeClaude Fable 5Anthropic · 52 in the newsGrok 4.20xAI
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)163152
Coding9642
Math9659
Reasoning & Knowledge8948
Agentic & Tools9655
Specifications
DeveloperAnthropicxAI
FamilyClaudeGrok
ReleasedJun 9, 2026Feb 17, 2026
Parameters500B
AvailabilityAPI accessAPI access
Context window1M2M
Price — $/M input$10.00$1.25
Price — $/M output$50.00$2.50
Inputstext, image, filetext, image, file
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/2025100%92%
APEX45%
ARC-AGI99%90%
ARC-AGI-289%65%
GPQA Diamond86%89%
Humanity's Last Exam56%
SciCode61%
SimpleBench82%
SimpleQA Verified71%30%
WebDev Arena16261374
WeirdML92%52%
τ²-bench99%
Terminal-Bench57%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Fable 5 better than Grok 4.20?

On Epoch AI's Capabilities Index, Claude Fable 5 scores higher (163) than Grok 4.20 (152). The right pick depends on your task — compare their coding, math, and reasoning scores in the table above.

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5 or Grok 4.20?

Grok 4.20 is cheaper on input tokens at $1.25 per million, versus $10.00 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, Claude Fable 5 or Grok 4.20?

Grok 4.20 supports up to 2M tokens, compared with 1M for the other.

Which is better for coding, Claude Fable 5 or Grok 4.20?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Claude Fable 5 ranks higher — 96th vs 42th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.