← All models
Compare

Claude Fable 5 vs GPT-6 Luna

Claude Fable 5 (Anthropic) and GPT-6 Luna (OpenAI) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeClaude Fable 5Anthropic · 52 in the newsGPT-6 LunaOpenAI
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)163
Coding9681
Math96
Reasoning & Knowledge8969
Agentic & Tools94
Specifications
DeveloperAnthropicOpenAI
FamilyClaudeGPT
ReleasedJun 9, 2026Sep 22, 2026
Parameters
AvailabilityAPI access
Context window1M1.1M
Price — $/M input$10.00$0.10
Price — $/M output$50.00$0.50
Inputstext, image, filefile, image, text
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/2025100%
APEX64%
ARC-AGI99%
ARC-AGI-289%
GPQA Diamond86%
Humanity's Last Exam56%39%
SciCode61%55%
SimpleBench82%
SimpleQA Verified71%
WebDev Arena1628
WeirdML92%
τ²-bench99%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5 or GPT-6 Luna?

GPT-6 Luna is cheaper on input tokens at $0.10 per million, versus $10.00 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, Claude Fable 5 or GPT-6 Luna?

GPT-6 Luna supports up to 1.1M tokens, compared with 1M for the other.

Which is better for coding, Claude Fable 5 or GPT-6 Luna?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Claude Fable 5 ranks higher — 96th vs 81th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.