← All models
Compare

Claude Fable 5 vs GPT-5.6 Luna

Claude Fable 5 (Anthropic) and GPT-5.6 Luna (OpenAI) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeClaude Fable 5Anthropic · 48 in the newsGPT-5.6 LunaOpenAI · 4 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)162156
Coding9876
Math9787
Reasoning & Knowledge9057
Agentic & Tools98
Specifications
DeveloperAnthropicOpenAI
FamilyClaudeGPT
ReleasedJun 9, 2026Jul 9, 2026
Parameters
AvailabilityAPI accessAPI access
Context window1M1.1M
Price — $/M input$10.00$0.20
Price — $/M output$50.00$1.20
Inputstext, image, filefile, image, text
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/2025100%98%
APEX45%
ARC-AGI99%88%
ARC-AGI-289%60%
GPQA Diamond86%92%
Humanity's Last Exam56%40%
SciCode60%53%
SimpleBench82%47%
SimpleQA Verified68%42%
WebDev Arena16541523
WeirdML92%61%
τ²-bench99%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Fable 5 better than GPT-5.6 Luna?

On Epoch AI's Capabilities Index, Claude Fable 5 scores higher (162) than GPT-5.6 Luna (156). The right pick depends on your task — compare their coding, math, and reasoning scores in the table above.

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5 or GPT-5.6 Luna?

GPT-5.6 Luna is cheaper on input tokens at $0.20 per million, versus $10.00 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, Claude Fable 5 or GPT-5.6 Luna?

GPT-5.6 Luna supports up to 1.1M tokens, compared with 1M for the other.

Which is better for coding, Claude Fable 5 or GPT-5.6 Luna?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Claude Fable 5 ranks higher — 98th vs 76th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.