Claude Fable 5 vs GPT-5.4
Claude Fable 5 (Anthropic) and GPT-5.4 (OpenAI) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.
- Claude Fable 5 leads on overall intelligence (ECI 161 vs 156).
- GPT-5.4 is cheaper on input tokens — $2.50 vs $10.00 per 1M.
- GPT-5.4 has a larger context window (1.1M vs 1M tokens).
- Claude Fable 5 ranks higher for coding (99th vs 78th percentile).
| Attribute | Claude Fable 5 | GPT-5.4 |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Intelligence (ECI) | 161 | 156 |
| Coding | 99 | 78 |
| Math | 95 | 88 |
| Reasoning & Knowledge | 96 | 79 |
| Agentic & Tools | 98 | 74 |
| Specifications | ||
| Developer | Anthropic | OpenAI |
| Family | Claude | GPT |
| Released | Jun 9, 2026 | Mar 5, 2026 |
| Parameters | — | — |
| Availability | API access | API access |
| Context window | 1M | 1.1M |
| Price — $/M input | $10.00 | $2.50 |
| Price — $/M output | $50.00 | $15.00 |
| Inputs | text, image, file | text, image, file |
| Outputs | text | text |
| Benchmarks | ||
| AIME 2024/2025 | 100% | 98% |
| APEX | 45% | 36% |
| GPQA Diamond | 93% | 93% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 53% | 36% |
| SciCode | 60% | 57% |
| SimpleBench | 82% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 68% | 45% |
| WebDev Arena | 1654 | 1457 |
| WeirdML | 92% | 78% |
| τ²-bench | 99% | 87% |
| ARC-AGI | — | 94% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 74% |
| FrontierMath | — | 48% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 27% |
| GSO (code optimization) | — | 31% |
| METR task horizon | — | 5.7 h |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 77% |
| Terminal-Bench | — | 82% |
Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude Fable 5 better than GPT-5.4?
On Epoch AI's Capabilities Index, Claude Fable 5 scores higher (161) than GPT-5.4 (156). The right pick depends on your task — compare their coding, math, and reasoning scores in the table above.
Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5 or GPT-5.4?
GPT-5.4 is cheaper on input tokens at $2.50 per million, versus $10.00 (representative OpenRouter pricing).
Which has a larger context window, Claude Fable 5 or GPT-5.4?
GPT-5.4 supports up to 1.1M tokens, compared with 1M for the other.
Which is better for coding, Claude Fable 5 or GPT-5.4?
Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Claude Fable 5 ranks higher — 99th vs 78th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.
Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.
More comparisons
Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.