← All models
Compare

Claude Fable 5 vs GLM-5.3

Claude Fable 5 (Anthropic) and GLM-5.3 (Z.ai (Zhipu AI)) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeClaude Fable 5Anthropic · 52 in the newsGLM-5.3Z.ai (Zhipu AI) · 12 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)163155
Coding9190
Math9144
Reasoning & Knowledge8667
Agentic & Tools9279
Specifications
DeveloperAnthropicZ.ai (Zhipu AI)
FamilyClaude—
ReleasedJun 9, 2026Aug 14, 2026
Parameters—744B
AvailabilityAPI accessAPI access
Context window1M1M
Price — $/M input$10.00$0.06
Price — $/M output$50.00$2.86
Inputstext, image, filetext
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/2025100%91%
APEX64%57%
ARC-AGI99%—
ARC-AGI-289%—
GPQA Diamond86%91%
GSO (code optimization)78%—
Humanity's Last Exam56%42%
SciCode61%59%
SimpleBench82%—
SimpleQA Verified71%41%
WebDev Arena16281614
WeirdML92%75%
τ²-bench99%—

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Fable 5 better than GLM-5.3?

On Epoch AI's Capabilities Index, Claude Fable 5 scores higher (163) than GLM-5.3 (155). The right pick depends on your task — compare their coding, math, and reasoning scores in the table above.

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5 or GLM-5.3?

GLM-5.3 is cheaper on input tokens at $0.06 per million, versus $10.00 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, Claude Fable 5 or GLM-5.3?

GLM-5.3 supports up to 1M tokens, compared with 1M for the other.

Which is better for coding, Claude Fable 5 or GLM-5.3?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Claude Fable 5 ranks higher — 91th vs 90th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.