← All models
Compare

Claude Fable 5 vs GLM-5.1

Claude Fable 5 (Anthropic) and GLM-5.1 (Z.ai (Zhipu AI)) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeClaude Fable 5Anthropic · 40 in the newsGLM-5.1Z.ai (Zhipu AI) · 7 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)161150
Coding9960
Math9563
Reasoning & Knowledge9649
Agentic & Tools9894
Specifications
DeveloperAnthropicZ.ai (Zhipu AI)
FamilyClaude
ReleasedJun 9, 2026Apr 7, 2026
Parameters754B
AvailabilityAPI access
Context window1M205K
Price — $/M input$10.00$0.98
Price — $/M output$50.00$4.30
Inputstext, image, filetext
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/2025100%92%
APEX45%
GPQA Diamond93%85%
Humanity's Last Exam53%28%
SciCode60%44%
SimpleBench82%55%
SimpleQA Verified68%37%
WebDev Arena16541534
WeirdML92%57%
τ²-bench99%98%
FrontierMath33%
FrontierMath Tier 413%
SWE-bench Verified74%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Fable 5 better than GLM-5.1?

On Epoch AI's Capabilities Index, Claude Fable 5 scores higher (161) than GLM-5.1 (150). The right pick depends on your task — compare their coding, math, and reasoning scores in the table above.

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5 or GLM-5.1?

GLM-5.1 is cheaper on input tokens at $0.98 per million, versus $10.00 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, Claude Fable 5 or GLM-5.1?

Claude Fable 5 supports up to 1M tokens, compared with 205K for the other.

Which is better for coding, Claude Fable 5 or GLM-5.1?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Claude Fable 5 ranks higher — 99th vs 60th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.