Claude Fable 5 vs GLM-4.6
Claude Fable 5 (Anthropic) and GLM-4.6 (Z.ai (Zhipu AI),Tsinghua University) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.
- Claude Fable 5 leads on overall intelligence (ECI 163 vs 141).
- GLM-4.6 is cheaper on input tokens — $0.60 vs $10.00 per 1M.
- Claude Fable 5 has a larger context window (1M vs 205K tokens).
- Claude Fable 5 ranks higher for coding (96th vs 19th percentile).
| Attribute | Claude Fable 5 | GLM-4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Intelligence (ECI) | 163 | 141 |
| Coding | 96 | 19 |
| Math | 96 | 20 |
| Reasoning & Knowledge | 89 | 22 |
| Agentic & Tools | 96 | 11 |
| Specifications | ||
| Developer | Anthropic | Z.ai (Zhipu AI),Tsinghua University |
| Family | Claude | — |
| Released | Jun 9, 2026 | Sep 30, 2025 |
| Parameters | — | 357B |
| Availability | API access | Open weights (unrestricted) |
| Context window | 1M | 205K |
| Price — $/M input | $10.00 | $0.60 |
| Price — $/M output | $50.00 | $2.20 |
| Inputs | text, image, file | text |
| Outputs | text | text |
| Benchmarks | ||
| AIME 2024/2025 | 100% | 86% |
| APEX | 45% | 4% |
| ARC-AGI | 99% | — |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 89% | — |
| GPQA Diamond | 86% | 78% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 56% | 14% |
| SciCode | 61% | 38% |
| SimpleBench | 82% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 71% | — |
| WebDev Arena | 1626 | 1340 |
| WeirdML | 92% | — |
| τ²-bench | 99% | 70% |
| FrontierMath | — | 4% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 2% |
| LiveCodeBench | — | 70% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 83% |
| Terminal-Bench | — | 25% |
Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude Fable 5 better than GLM-4.6?
On Epoch AI's Capabilities Index, Claude Fable 5 scores higher (163) than GLM-4.6 (141). The right pick depends on your task — compare their coding, math, and reasoning scores in the table above.
Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5 or GLM-4.6?
GLM-4.6 is cheaper on input tokens at $0.60 per million, versus $10.00 (representative OpenRouter pricing).
Which has a larger context window, Claude Fable 5 or GLM-4.6?
Claude Fable 5 supports up to 1M tokens, compared with 205K for the other.
Which is better for coding, Claude Fable 5 or GLM-4.6?
Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Claude Fable 5 ranks higher — 96th vs 19th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.
Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.
More comparisons
Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.