← All models
Compare

Claude Fable 5 vs GLM-4.5

Claude Fable 5 (Anthropic) and GLM-4.5 (Z.ai (Zhipu AI),Tsinghua University) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeClaude Fable 5Anthropic · 40 in the newsGLM-4.5Z.ai (Zhipu AI),Tsinghua University · 9 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)161
Coding9925
Math9515
Reasoning & Knowledge9627
Agentic & Tools9815
Specifications
DeveloperAnthropicZ.ai (Zhipu AI),Tsinghua University
FamilyClaude
ReleasedJun 9, 2026Aug 5, 2025
Parameters355B
AvailabilityAPI accessOpen weights (unrestricted)
Context window1M131K
Price — $/M input$10.00$0.60
Price — $/M output$50.00$2.20
Inputstext, image, filetext
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/2025100%74%
APEX45%
GPQA Diamond93%78%
Humanity's Last Exam53%8%
SciCode60%35%
SimpleBench82%
SimpleQA Verified68%
WebDev Arena1654
WeirdML92%41%
τ²-bench99%43%
LiveCodeBench74%
MMLU-Pro84%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5 or GLM-4.5?

GLM-4.5 is cheaper on input tokens at $0.60 per million, versus $10.00 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, Claude Fable 5 or GLM-4.5?

Claude Fable 5 supports up to 1M tokens, compared with 131K for the other.

Which is better for coding, Claude Fable 5 or GLM-4.5?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Claude Fable 5 ranks higher — 99th vs 25th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.