← All models
Compare

Claude Fable 5 vs Gemma 4 26B A4B

Claude Fable 5 (Anthropic) and Gemma 4 26B A4B (Google DeepMind) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeClaude Fable 5Anthropic · 52 in the newsGemma 4 26B A4BGoogle DeepMind
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)163142
Coding9120
Math9117
Reasoning & Knowledge8612
Agentic & Tools928
Specifications
DeveloperAnthropicGoogle DeepMind
FamilyClaudeGemma
ReleasedJun 9, 2026Apr 2, 2026
Parameters——
AvailabilityAPI accessOpen weights (unrestricted)
Context window1M—
Price — $/M input$10.00—
Price — $/M output$50.00—
Inputstext, image, file—
Outputstext—
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/2025100%82%
APEX64%—
ARC-AGI99%—
ARC-AGI-289%—
GPQA Diamond86%73%
GSO (code optimization)78%—
Humanity's Last Exam56%19%
SciCode61%40%
SimpleBench82%—
SimpleQA Verified71%—
WebDev Arena16281361
WeirdML92%35%
τ²-bench99%44%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Fable 5 better than Gemma 4 26B A4B?

On Epoch AI's Capabilities Index, Claude Fable 5 scores higher (163) than Gemma 4 26B A4B (142). The right pick depends on your task — compare their coding, math, and reasoning scores in the table above.

Which is better for coding, Claude Fable 5 or Gemma 4 26B A4B?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Claude Fable 5 ranks higher — 91th vs 20th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.