← All models
Compare

Claude Fable 5 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Claude Fable 5 (Anthropic) and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (Google) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeClaude Fable 5Anthropic · 34 in the newsGemini 3.5 Flash-LiteGoogle
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)161
Coding10034
Math94
Reasoning & Knowledge9532
Agentic & Tools97
Specifications
DeveloperAnthropicGoogle
FamilyClaudeGemini
ReleasedJun 9, 2026Jul 21, 2026
Parameters
AvailabilityAPI access
Context window1M1M
Price — $/M input$10.00$0.30
Price — $/M output$50.00$2.50
Inputstext, image, filetext, image, video, file, audio
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/2025100%
APEX45%
GPQA Diamond93%84%
Humanity's Last Exam53%18%
SciCode60%41%
SimpleBench82%
SimpleQA Verified68%
WebDev Arena1654
WeirdML88%
τ²-bench99%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5 or Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite?

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is cheaper on input tokens at $0.30 per million, versus $10.00 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, Claude Fable 5 or Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite?

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite supports up to 1M tokens, compared with 1M for the other.

Which is better for coding, Claude Fable 5 or Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Claude Fable 5 ranks higher — 100th vs 34th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.