← All models
Compare

Claude Fable 5 vs Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Claude Fable 5 (Anthropic) and Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite (Google DeepMind) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeClaude Fable 5Anthropic · 40 in the newsGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteGoogle DeepMind · 1 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)161
Coding996
Math954
Reasoning & Knowledge965
Agentic & Tools980
Specifications
DeveloperAnthropicGoogle DeepMind
FamilyClaudeGemini
ReleasedJun 9, 2026Sep 25, 2025
Parameters
AvailabilityAPI accessAPI access
Context window1M1M
Price — $/M input$10.00$0.10
Price — $/M output$50.00$0.40
Inputstext, image, filetext, image, file, audio, video
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/2025100%53%
APEX45%
GPQA Diamond93%63%
Humanity's Last Exam53%6%
SciCode60%19%
SimpleBench82%
SimpleQA Verified68%
WebDev Arena1654
WeirdML92%35%
τ²-bench99%18%
LiveCodeBench59%
MMLU-Pro76%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5 or Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite?

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is cheaper on input tokens at $0.10 per million, versus $10.00 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, Claude Fable 5 or Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite?

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite supports up to 1M tokens, compared with 1M for the other.

Which is better for coding, Claude Fable 5 or Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Claude Fable 5 ranks higher — 99th vs 6th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.