← All models
Compare

Claude Fable 5 vs DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813

Claude Fable 5 (Anthropic) and DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 (DeepSeek) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeClaude Fable 5Anthropic · 47 in the newsDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813DeepSeek · 1 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)162
Coding9880
Math9790
Reasoning & Knowledge9078
Agentic & Tools98
Specifications
DeveloperAnthropicDeepSeek
FamilyClaudeDeepSeek
ReleasedJun 9, 2026Aug 13, 2026
Parameters1.6T
AvailabilityAPI accessOpen weights (unrestricted)
Context window1M1M
Price — $/M input$10.00$0.66
Price — $/M output$50.00$1.98
Inputstext, image, filetext
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/2025100%99%
APEX45%
ARC-AGI99%
ARC-AGI-289%
GPQA Diamond86%92%
Humanity's Last Exam56%41%
SciCode60%49%
SimpleBench82%
SimpleQA Verified68%55%
WebDev Arena16541584
WeirdML92%66%
τ²-bench99%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5 or DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813?

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 is cheaper on input tokens at $0.66 per million, versus $10.00 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, Claude Fable 5 or DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813?

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 supports up to 1M tokens, compared with 1M for the other.

Which is better for coding, Claude Fable 5 or DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Claude Fable 5 ranks higher — 98th vs 80th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.