← All models
Compare

Claude Fable 5 vs DeepSeek-V4-Flash

Claude Fable 5 (Anthropic) and DeepSeek-V4-Flash (DeepSeek) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeClaude Fable 5Anthropic · 40 in the newsDeepSeek-V4-FlashDeepSeek · 1 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)161
Coding9960
Math95
Reasoning & Knowledge9658
Agentic & Tools9881
Specifications
DeveloperAnthropicDeepSeek
FamilyClaudeDeepSeek
ReleasedJun 9, 2026Apr 24, 2026
Parameters284B
AvailabilityAPI accessOpen weights (unrestricted)
Context window1M1M
Price — $/M input$10.00$0.13
Price — $/M output$50.00$0.28
Inputstext, image, filetext
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/2025100%
APEX45%
GPQA Diamond93%89%
Humanity's Last Exam53%32%
SciCode60%45%
SimpleBench82%
SimpleQA Verified68%
WebDev Arena1654
WeirdML92%46%
τ²-bench99%95%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5 or DeepSeek-V4-Flash?

DeepSeek-V4-Flash is cheaper on input tokens at $0.13 per million, versus $10.00 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, Claude Fable 5 or DeepSeek-V4-Flash?

DeepSeek-V4-Flash supports up to 1M tokens, compared with 1M for the other.

Which is better for coding, Claude Fable 5 or DeepSeek-V4-Flash?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Claude Fable 5 ranks higher — 99th vs 60th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.