Claude Fable 5 vs DeepSeek-V4-Flash
Claude Fable 5 (Anthropic) and DeepSeek-V4-Flash (DeepSeek) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.
- Claude Fable 5 leads on overall intelligence (ECI 163 vs 146).
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash is cheaper on input tokens — $0.07 vs $10.00 per 1M.
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash has a larger context window (1M vs 1M tokens).
- Claude Fable 5 ranks higher for coding (96th vs 33th percentile).
| Attribute | Claude Fable 5 | DeepSeek-V4-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Intelligence (ECI) | 163 | 146 |
| Coding | 96 | 33 |
| Math | 96 | — |
| Reasoning & Knowledge | 89 | 36 |
| Agentic & Tools | 96 | 78 |
| Specifications | ||
| Developer | Anthropic | DeepSeek |
| Family | Claude | DeepSeek |
| Released | Jun 9, 2026 | Apr 24, 2026 |
| Parameters | — | 284B |
| Availability | API access | Open weights (unrestricted) |
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| Price — $/M input | $10.00 | $0.07 |
| Price — $/M output | $50.00 | $0.17 |
| Inputs | text, image, file | text |
| Outputs | text | text |
| Benchmarks | ||
| AIME 2024/2025 | 100% | — |
| APEX | 45% | 35% |
| ARC-AGI | 99% | — |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 89% | — |
| GPQA Diamond | 86% | 87% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 56% | 30% |
| SciCode | 61% | 40% |
| SimpleBench | 82% | 46% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 71% | — |
| WebDev Arena | 1626 | 1431 |
| WeirdML | 92% | 46% |
| τ²-bench | 99% | 96% |
Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude Fable 5 better than DeepSeek-V4-Flash?
On Epoch AI's Capabilities Index, Claude Fable 5 scores higher (163) than DeepSeek-V4-Flash (146). The right pick depends on your task — compare their coding, math, and reasoning scores in the table above.
Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5 or DeepSeek-V4-Flash?
DeepSeek-V4-Flash is cheaper on input tokens at $0.07 per million, versus $10.00 (representative OpenRouter pricing).
Which has a larger context window, Claude Fable 5 or DeepSeek-V4-Flash?
DeepSeek-V4-Flash supports up to 1M tokens, compared with 1M for the other.
Which is better for coding, Claude Fable 5 or DeepSeek-V4-Flash?
Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Claude Fable 5 ranks higher — 96th vs 33th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.
Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.
More comparisons
Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.