← All models
Compare

Claude Fable 5 vs DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus

Claude Fable 5 (Anthropic) and DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus (DeepSeek) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeClaude Fable 5Anthropic · 42 in the newsDeepSeek-V3.1-TerminusDeepSeek
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)162
Coding9945
Math9549
Reasoning & Knowledge9641
Agentic & Tools9813
Specifications
DeveloperAnthropicDeepSeek
FamilyClaudeDeepSeek
ReleasedJun 9, 2026Sep 22, 2025
Parameters
AvailabilityAPI accessOpen weights (unrestricted)
Context window1M164K
Price — $/M input$10.00$0.27
Price — $/M output$50.00$1.00
Inputstext, image, filetext
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/2025100%90%
APEX45%
GPQA Diamond93%79%
Humanity's Last Exam53%15%
SciCode60%41%
SimpleBench82%
SimpleQA Verified68%
WebDev Arena1654
WeirdML92%
τ²-bench99%37%
LiveCodeBench80%
MMLU-Pro85%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5 or DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus?

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus is cheaper on input tokens at $0.27 per million, versus $10.00 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, Claude Fable 5 or DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus?

Claude Fable 5 supports up to 1M tokens, compared with 164K for the other.

Which is better for coding, Claude Fable 5 or DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Claude Fable 5 ranks higher — 99th vs 45th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.