Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Fable 5 (Anthropic) and Claude Opus 4.6 (Anthropic) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.
- Claude Fable 5 leads on overall intelligence (ECI 161 vs 155).
- Claude Opus 4.6 is cheaper on input tokens — $5.00 vs $10.00 per 1M.
- Claude Fable 5 ranks higher for coding (99th vs 88th percentile).
| Attribute | Claude Fable 5 | Claude Opus 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Intelligence (ECI) | 161 | 155 |
| Coding | 99 | 88 |
| Math | 95 | 79 |
| Reasoning & Knowledge | 96 | 76 |
| Agentic & Tools | 98 | 78 |
| Specifications | ||
| Developer | Anthropic | Anthropic |
| Family | Claude | Claude |
| Released | Jun 9, 2026 | Feb 5, 2026 |
| Parameters | — | — |
| Availability | API access | API access |
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| Price — $/M input | $10.00 | $5.00 |
| Price — $/M output | $50.00 | $25.00 |
| Inputs | text, image, file | text, image, file |
| Outputs | text | text |
| Benchmarks | ||
| AIME 2024/2025 | 100% | 94% |
| APEX | 45% | 32% |
| GPQA Diamond | 93% | 91% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 53% | 34% |
| SciCode | 60% | 52% |
| SimpleBench | 82% | 68% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 68% | 46% |
| WebDev Arena | 1654 | 1556 |
| WeirdML | 92% | 78% |
| τ²-bench | 99% | 92% |
| ARC-AGI | — | 94% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 69% |
| FrontierMath | — | 41% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 23% |
| GSO (code optimization) | — | 41% |
| METR task horizon | — | 12.0 h |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 79% |
| Terminal-Bench | — | 80% |
Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude Fable 5 better than Claude Opus 4.6?
On Epoch AI's Capabilities Index, Claude Fable 5 scores higher (161) than Claude Opus 4.6 (155). The right pick depends on your task — compare their coding, math, and reasoning scores in the table above.
Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5 or Claude Opus 4.6?
Claude Opus 4.6 is cheaper on input tokens at $5.00 per million, versus $10.00 (representative OpenRouter pricing).
Which has a larger context window, Claude Fable 5 or Claude Opus 4.6?
Claude Fable 5 supports up to 1M tokens, compared with 1M for the other.
Which is better for coding, Claude Fable 5 or Claude Opus 4.6?
Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Claude Fable 5 ranks higher — 99th vs 88th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.
Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.
More comparisons
Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.