← All models
Compare

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Grok 4.6

Claude Fable 5.1 (Anthropic) and Grok 4.6 (xAI) compared on benchmarks, pricing, context window, and use-case rankings.

AttributeClaude Fable 5.1Anthropic · 8 in the newsGrok 4.6xAI · 2 in the news
Scores
Intelligence (ECI)163156
Coding10092
Math9692
Reasoning & Knowledge9473
Agentic & Tools9885
Specifications
DeveloperAnthropicxAI
FamilyClaudeGrok
ReleasedSep 1, 2026Aug 12, 2026
Parameters
AvailabilityAPI accessAPI access
Context window1M500K
Price — $/M input$10.00$2.00
Price — $/M output$50.00$6.00
Inputstext, image, filetext, image, file
Outputstexttext
Benchmarks
AIME 2024/2025100%99%
APEX47%41%
ARC-AGI98%88%
ARC-AGI-290%67%
GPQA Diamond94%94%
Humanity's Last Exam47%43%
SciCode63%56%
SimpleQA Verified71%49%
WebDev Arena17651629
WeirdML93%67%
SimpleBench76%

Use-case scores are 0–100 percentile composites across each area’s benchmarks, ranked against every model from the past year. Highlighted cells lead each row. Open a model for the full picture.

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Fable 5.1 better than Grok 4.6?

On Epoch AI's Capabilities Index, Claude Fable 5.1 scores higher (163) than Grok 4.6 (156). The right pick depends on your task — compare their coding, math, and reasoning scores in the table above.

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.1 or Grok 4.6?

Grok 4.6 is cheaper on input tokens at $2.00 per million, versus $10.00 (representative OpenRouter pricing).

Which has a larger context window, Claude Fable 5.1 or Grok 4.6?

Claude Fable 5.1 supports up to 1M tokens, compared with 500K for the other.

Which is better for coding, Claude Fable 5.1 or Grok 4.6?

Across coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench, Claude Fable 5.1 ranks higher — 100th vs 92th percentile among the models tracked on Model Beat.

Want a different match-up? Open the compare tool to add or swap models.

Benchmarks & model data from Epoch AI (CC BY); pricing & specs from OpenRouter. ECI = Epoch Capabilities Index.